Thursday’s report by the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board will cover $143 billion of funding, or about 18 percent of the total stimulus package, Reuters says. That’s partially because stimulus funding is spread over two years, but also reflects a limitation in the report’s remit: the study will focus on projects funded through the Department of Energy and General Services Administration. Over the stimulus package’s lifespan, these reports will only cover $276 billion, or 35 percent of the package.
“Whatever jobs figures come out will also undoubtedly be a tiny sliver of the Recovery Act’s total job impact,” said Gary Bass, executive director of OMB Watch, a non-profit that monitors the federal budget.
Thursday’s report, together with one later in the month, will include information on:
- Spending in each state
- Top executives in companies affiliated with stimulus work
- Employment figures
- How far projects have progressed
- Vendors used
More local papers have reported on their state’s figures ahead of the report launch. Notably:
New Mexico: More than 8,600 teachers, construction workers and police officers kept their jobs or found new ones because of stimulus spending. Projects have included airport improvements, new roads, energy-efficient traffic lights and money for teachers’ aides. But “it wasn’t immediately clear how many jobs were saved and how many are new,” New Mexican reporter Kate Nash said.
Wisconsin: The state used nearly $680 million in stimulus funds to save or create 8,284 full-time jobs in Wisconsin, the Business Journal of Milwaukee says.
Ohio: The state has spent $1.6 billion of its $8.5 billion stimulus cash, creating or saving 13,144 full-time jobs.
Finally, at least six states – including Georgia, Texas, Virginia, Florida and New York – have refused to erect signs informing drivers when road projects have been funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, the New York Times says. Some politicians have complained that such signs smack of political self-interest, while others say they’re just a waste of money.
In Georgia the signs cost an average of $1,200 each. With two signs per project and 119 construction contracts awarded through September, that’s $285,600 saved. I calculate that’s enough to pay for six new jobs at Georgia’s average wage.
But the Department of Transportation’s director for public affairs, Jill Zuckman, argues, “We think the signs promote transparency and accountability — so taxpayers can know where their money is being spent and on what.”
My take: if the stimulus creates recognizable improvements to states’ economies and infrastructure, and if more stimulus measures are required, then signs could bolster public support for politicians who back further stimulus funding, and this could eventually lead to increased job creation. That would justify money being spent on signs instead of jobs in the short term. But that’s a lot of “if”s. Georgia and its ilk probably have the right idea.